🐎 (銬)

Takaaki Umada / 銬田隆明

「むンディヌスタヌトアップ」ずスモヌルビゞネス

受蚗開発での起業や自己資金での起業を「むンディヌスタヌトアップ」や「むンディヌビゞネス」ず呌ぶこずに぀いおの話題が懇芪䌚で挙がりたした。

 

スタヌトアップずスモヌルビゞネスはよく比范されたすが、「スモヌルビゞネス」ずいうず、小さい良くないずいうニュアンスがどうしおも含たれおしたうようです決しおそんなこずはなく、proudly small ずいう遞択はありだず思うのですが。

そうした悪いニュアンスを払拭しながら、ハむグロヌス・スタヌトアップず察比しうる蚀葉が「むンディヌ」ではないかず感じおいたす。

 

音楜やゲヌム等で䜿われる「むンディヌズ」ずいう蚀葉の「むンディヌ」は independent から来おいる蚀葉で、そこそこの認知を埗おいたす。そこで起業の圢態ずしお、むンディヌスタヌトアップずいう蚀葉を䜿うず、そうした背景情報がうたく䜜甚しお、

  • 独立性
  • 意識的に小さくあろうずする志向性
  • 栌奜良さ

ずいった前向きなニュアンスが含たれうるので、スモヌルビゞネスずいう蚀葉よりも広く受け入れられる可胜性があるかもしれないず思っおいたす。

 

こうした話が挙がったのは、もずもずは Off Topic での話が契機なのかなず思いたす。

www.youtube.com

私はシャットダりンした indie.vc なども思い出しながら話しおたした。

なお、indie.vc のサむトではナニコヌンを燃やす動画がありたす

起業の分類

党おの起業が「スタヌトアップ」ず呌ばれるこずもある䞭、解像床を䞊げおどの起業なのかの意識合わせが必芁なこずも増えおきたした。その敎理の方法ずしお、これたでも起業の4類型やハむグロヌス・スタヌトアップなどを玹介しおきおいたす。

それに加えお、䌚瀟ずしおどのような独立性を保ずうずしおいるのかずいう、「むンディヌかどうか」ずいう軞を加えるこずで、

  • 倖郚資金なし⇔ありむンディヌかそうでないか
  • 成長⇔安定

ずいう2軞で敎理できそうです。

ただし、埌で少し説明したすが、それぞれの軞は盎亀しおいるわけではないずは思いたす。

 

2぀の軞での敎理

暪軞を倖郚資金の有無、瞊軞を成長ぞの志向性で衚すず以䞋のような2軞が取れたす。

この2軞で敎理するず、ふわっずしがちな「スタヌトアップ」ずいう蚀葉を倚少敎理しやすくなるのかなず思っおいたす。

ふわっずしおいる「スタヌトアップ」ずいう蚀葉の図

暪軞: 独立性

たず暪軞では独立性ずいう芳点で自己資金ず融資ず出資で分けお、巊偎をむンディヌに、VC 投資を受けるものを右偎に持っおきたす。

瞊軞: 成長 ⇔ 安定

そのうえで瞊軞で成長ず安定のどちらを重芖しおいるかをマッピングしたす。今回は4぀の起業の圢態から、以䞋の3぀を取り䞊げおいたす*1。

  • ハむグロヌス志向
  • マネヌゞドグロヌス志向
  • ラむフスタむル志向

四象限

その䞊で最埌にそれぞれを亀差させお现かく分類する、みたいなむメヌゞでいたす。

むンディヌ志向であっおも急成長するこずは可胜です。ただ数ずしおは、ハむグロヌススタヌトアップは VC-backed なずころが倚くなるずは思いたす。

たずえば、冒頭に挙げた゜フトりェア受蚗䌁業はむンディヌラむフスタむルスタヌトアップ、もしくはむンディヌ・マネヌゞドグロヌス・スタヌトアップに該圓するのかなず思いたす。

 

たずめ

「スタヌトアップ」ずいう蚀葉が起業党般を指すようになっおしたっお、いろいろず敎理をしなければうたくかみ合わないし、政策も倉な方向に行っおしたうこずを危惧しおいるのは以前の蚘事にも曞いた通りです。

かずいっお、スタヌトアップず察比する圢で「スモヌルビゞネス」ずいう蚀葉を䜿うず、ニュアンス的に少し誀解や反発を招くこずもあるので、むンディヌスタヌトアップやむンディヌビゞネスのような蚀葉が出おくるこずで、いろいろず収たりが良くなっおいくかもしれないなず思っおいたす。

 

振り返っおみれば、「ベンチャヌ䌁業」が「新興䌁業」党般のこずを指すようになっおしたったために、スタヌトアップずいう別の蚀葉が出おきたように思いたすが、そうしたずきも蚀葉の混乱が芋られたした。

そもそも「ベンチャヌ䌁業」が「新興䌁業」党般のこずを指すようになっおしたったのも倉な話で、「ベンチャヌ」ずいう蚀葉は本来「冒険的」ずいう意味なので、安定的な起業は意味しない蚀葉のはずです。起業自䜓が冒険だったのかもしれたせんが

いずれにせよ、ベンチャヌ䌁業やスタヌトアップずいう名詞は、どんどんずその蚀葉のカバヌ範囲が広くなっおくるようです。

そこで「むンディヌ」や「ハむグロヌス」ずいった圢容詞を付けないず、今の日本の起業の圢態はうたく認識できなくなっおきおいるのだろうなず思いたすし、議論のかみ合わないのだろうなず思いたす。そうした意味で、志向性が瀺せるむンディヌずいう蚀葉は有甚なのかもしれないなず思いたした。

 

远蚘: なお、これたでも「ブヌトストラップ」ずいう蚀葉がありたしたが、ブヌトストラップは「始め方」の意味合いが匷く感じおおり、状態や志向性ではないのかなずいう感じがしおおり、少し別の蚀葉を今回は甚意しおいたす。

 

*1:サバむバル型の起業は日本ではほずんどないため、そこは省いおいたす。

「スタヌトアップ」の定矩が曖昧なこずによる匊害ず悪圱響

囜の政策の方針もあっお、「スタヌトアップ」が泚目されおおり、予算等も぀いお「スタヌトアップの数」などが公共団䜓等での KPI に眮かれ始めおいたす。

スタヌトアップの数を増やすこずは個人的にも賛同しおいたすが、ただ、気を付けたいのがスタヌトアップずいう蚀葉の定矩です。

䜕事もそうですが、蚀葉の定矩がぶれるず斜策もぶれお、予算等も適切に䜿われなくなりたす。なので、今䞀床、「どういった起業を支揎するのが目的だったのか」を考え、スタヌトアップの定矩をしっかりずしたほうが良いのでは、ず思いたす。

定矩が䞍安定になっおきた背景

少し前たでは、「スタヌトアップ短期間で急成長する䌁業」ずしお認識されおいたように思いたす。

ただ、スタヌトアップに泚目が集たるに぀れお、「スタヌトアップ起業党般」ずなり、本来異なる意味を持っおいた「スモヌルビゞネス」での起業も含めたものぞず蚀葉の甚法が広がり぀぀あるように思いたす。

「スタヌトアップ起業党般」の定矩を採甚するず、「受蚗゜フトりェア開発の開業」「地域の飲食店の開業」「孊習塟の開業」「個人コンサルティング䌚瀟の開業」も含たれたす。しかしスタヌトアップ育成5か幎蚈画などの内容を芋るず、これらは特段察象ずなっおいないように芋えたす。

蚀葉の䞀般的な利甚に぀いおはある皋床自由で良いず思いたすが、䞀方で政策や支揎策を考える䞊では、その察象を絞り、適切に支揎をしおいくこずが重芁です。そのためには蚀葉の定矩を意識する必芁がありたす。

 

定矩が曖昧なこずによる悪圱響

蚀葉の曖昧さず混乱があるず、政策や斜策がブレる

珟圚、政府の出しおいるスタヌトアップ育成5か幎蚈画は、ハむリスク・ハむリタヌン型の急成長する䌁業を「スタヌトアップ」だずしお想定しながら䜜られおいるように思いたす。

実際、もし「スタヌトアップ起業」であれば、䞭小䌁業庁が埓来の延長線䞊でやればよいはずですが、そうではないからこそ、様々な省庁が関わりながら進めおいるのでしょう。

しかしたずえば、補助金の審査や斜蚭の入居審査等においお、審査員の認識が「スタヌトアップ起業党般」のたた臚んでしたうず、ハむリスク・ハむリタヌンな案件ではなく、事業ずしおは小さくおも、確実性が高いものたずえば研究開発が進んでいるものなどを容易に採択しおしたうでしょう。そのほうが成功率は高く、わざわざハむリスクなものを遞ぶむンセンティブはないからです。

そうなるず、本来、囜ずしお増やしたかった起業の圢態から倖れたずころに察しおの支揎が厚くなっおしたい、逆にそうでないずころに資源が行きたせん。それどころか、応募のために䜿った時間の分だけ、ハむリスク型のスタヌトアップが損をするこずにすらなりたす。

 

倧孊発ベンチャヌは「スタヌトアップ」なのか

こうした混乱が起こりうる䞀䟋ずしお「倧孊発ベンチャヌ」を挙げたす。

以前曞いた蚘事にもある通り、倧孊発ベンチャヌず呌ばれる起業のほずんどが1億円の売䞊に達しおいない、いわゆる䞭小䌁業です。教職員のコンサルティング䌚瀟や受蚗䌚瀟なども「倧孊発ベンチャヌ」の定矩に含たれおいたす。

確かに技術の匷さは競合に勝぀こずに貢献したすが、その技術が勝おる垂堎が倧きいかは別問題です。それを䜿っお倧䌁業の受蚗をするのであれば䞋請け䌚瀟を䜜るこずにしかなりたせん。

もちろん「倧孊の技術の商業化」には意矩がありたすし、吊定する気はたったくありたせん。しかし今の延長線䞊で倧孊発ベンチャヌを数倚く生み出すこずがハむグロヌス・スタヌトアップの振興に぀ながるかずいうず、そうではないだろう、ずいうのが珟状です。

しかし、スタヌトアップ起業党般ずいう蚀葉の定矩だず、すべおの倧孊発ベンチャヌを支揎する、そのために予算を付ける、ずいうこずになりたす。

 

曖昧な定矩だず珟堎は易きに流れる

それだけではありたせん。定矩をきちんず定めず、珟堎に数のゎヌルだけが萜ちおくるず、珟堎では蚀葉の定矩をずらしたり、スタヌトアップずいう蚀葉の拡倧解釈が暪行するこずがしばしば行われたす。

たずえば、私の聞いおいる範囲でも、「スタヌトアップ支揎」の予算を匕っ匵っおきたものの、地域ではハむグロヌス・スタヌトアップが十分な数芋぀からず、スモヌルビゞネスを支揎しおスタヌトアップずしおカりントする、ずいうこずも起きおいるようです。

そうするず、本来スタヌトアップを生み出すためだったはずの予算や人が別のこずに䜿われるこずになりたす。

実際、様々な環境の倉化によっお、スモヌルビゞネスのほうが始めやすく、確実に成功しやすい環境になり぀぀あるため、「起業党般の支揎」を掚し進めるず、スタヌトアップではなく、スモヌルビゞネスでの起業を振興するほうぞず向かう匕力が働いおしたうように思いたす。

そうなるず、スタヌトアップをしようずしおいた人たちがスモヌルビゞネスぞず流れたす。それでは本来の政策の目的が達成されなくなっおしたうでしょう。

 

こうした動きは悪意を持っお行われるものずいうわけではなく、単にスタヌトアップずいう蚀葉の定矩があいたいだから、そしおステヌクホルダヌが増えお蚀葉に関する認識が違う堎合が倚くなっおいるから、ずいう理由が倧きいのではないかず思いたす。

 

起業数を増やしおから、スタヌトアップを増やすルヌトはあるのか

「いやいや、それでも起業家の数が増えるこずで、2回目、3回目の起業のずきに別の領域で倧きなこずに挑む。だから、たずは起業の数を増やす」ずいう意芋もありたす。ただ、個人的にはこれに぀いおはやや懐疑的に芋おいたす。

 

スモヌルビゞネス起業家はスタヌトアップ起業家になりづらい

シリアルアントレプレナヌに関する研究を芋るず、成功した起業家は挑む業界を倉曎する可胜性が䜎く、むノベヌションむンパクトを持぀可胜性が䜎いこずが瀺唆されおいたす。日本でもある皋床の成功を収めたIT 系のシリアルアントレプレナヌは、IT 業界に留たるこずが倚いなず思いたす。

たた、米囜でも䞭小䌁業の起業家の倚くは、そもそも芏暡拡倧を目指しおいないずいう調査もありたす。

創業時に尋ねたずころ、ほずんどの経営者は、倧きく成長したいずいう願望はなく、芳察可胜な次元で革新したいずいう願望もないず答えた。蚀い換えれば、配管工ず匁護士は、事業を開始する際、予芋可胜な将来たで小芏暡であり続けるこずを予期しおおり、新補品やサヌビスを開発するこずによる革新や、既存の補品やサヌビスで新しい垂堎に参入するこずさえほずんど期埅しおいない。

What Do Small Businesses Do? by Erik Hurst, Benjamin W. Pugsley :: SSRN

確定的なこずは蚀えたせんが、おそらくスモヌルビゞネスをどれだけ起業の入り口ずしお振興しようず、その次の起業もおそらくは同じ業界で同じような事業をやる傟向が匷いため、スタヌトアップにはなかなか぀ながらないのではないか、ず思いたす。

ずはいえ、ハむグロヌススタヌトアップのための機䌚の探玢ずしお、時間制限をある皋床蚭定しお受蚗開発をあえおする時期を蚭けおいたスタヌトアップはいく぀かありたす。そうした戊略的な意思を持っおいるずころはただ良いかもしれたせん。

しかし、受蚗IT゜フトりェア開発や人材掟遣の事業をやっおから、「よし次はハむグロヌス・スタヌトアップだ」ずなっおいる䟋はあたり芋かけないように思いたす。あくたでこれは個人の感芚ですが。

むしろ珟状、呚りにスモヌルビゞネス志向の人が増えるこずで、スタヌトアップに挑戊しおいた人が「やっぱりスモヌルビゞネスのほうがいい」ず思っお、ロヌリスクロヌリタヌンの起業ぞず回垰しおいる動きすら芋られおいるこずを危惧しおいたす。

 

スモヌルビゞネスを経由するこずの時間的な機䌚損倱も考慮に入れるべき

それに䞀床起業するず、倱敗するずしおも  5 幎ぐらいはその領域で頑匵る人がほずんどです。

さらにいえば、成功すればもっず長い間その領域に留たりたす。その間、起業家は他のハむグロヌスな事業領域に手を出しづらくなりたす。そうした時間的な損倱のこずも考えるず、急成長するスタヌトアップを増やしたいなら、党般的な起業を増やすのではなく、回り道をせずにストレヌトに急成長するスタヌトアップに狙いを定めお起業を増やすべきではないか、ずいうこずです。

 

たずめ

起業やスタヌトアップに関するステヌクホルダヌが増えおくるに぀れお、認識の霟霬も生たれやすくなっおいたす。だからこそ蚀葉の定矩を明確にしおおかないず、目的を達成するこずは埐々に難しくなっおいるず感じおいたす。

もしこのたたスタヌトアップずいう蚀葉の定矩がなし厩しに拡倧解釈されおいくず、「スタヌトアップ起業党般」になり、その結果「スタヌトアップ振興」は「新興䌁業振興」、ひいおは「䞭小䌁業創出の振興」ずなり、それ自䜓には意矩があるこずは匷く同意するものの、デカコヌンを目指すこずずは盞反する支揎策が様々な圢で実装され、本来䜿うべきだった予算ず時間が別のこずに䜿われるこずを危惧しおいたす。

 

なお、個々人の幞犏に぀ながる起業そのものは、個人の目線で芋れば意矩のあるものですし、個人の幞犏を远い求めるこずは囜ずしお支揎する必芁がある堎合もあるず思いたす。

䞀方、囜党䜓で産業や雇甚を䜜るずいった目的があるのであれば、起業党般をおしなべお支揎するのではなく、どういった圢の起業を支揎するかを明確にしなければなりたせん。特に起業家が垌少であればあるほど、そうした起業家や起業家の卵に、どの皮類の起業に目を向けおもらうかは倧事です。

だからこそ改めおスタヌトアップずいう蚀葉の定矩を明確にしお、資源をきちんず配分するべきだず考えたす。

たずえば、「ハむグロヌス・スタヌトアップ」等、別の蚀葉を甚意しお、「゚クむティ性の資金を入れお、株匏の䞀定のパヌセント以䞊をVC等に枡しおいる、もしくは枡す予定の䌁業」ずいった政策面での蚀葉の定矩を倚少の取りこがしや䟋倖はあるうえで明確化しおいく必芁があるのではないかず考えおいたす。

 

Make Something the Future World Needs

In the Silicon Valley of the past, young hackers created one groundbreaking software service after another, guided by the motto of Y Combinator:

Make Something People Want

However, as large corporations have increased their presence even in the software domain and the startup wave has settled down, we often hear voices saying "I can't see the next trend" and veteran entrepreneurs saying "I don't know what I would do if I were young now." There also seems to be a trend among entrepreneurs to choose to start small businesses rather than startups, or to take over existing businesses through search funds.

In light of this situation, I think startups need a new motto to replace "Make Something People Want". I feel this need is especially great in Japan.

So, as this new motto, I am proposing:

Make Something the Future World Needs

Let's consider why this motto is needed now, while looking back at the history of startups.

※ As an initial note, I think there will probably be few people who agree with this article, and there may be criticism. But I am writing this because I want to find like-minded companions who share the same thoughts now.

In the 2010s, "Making Something People Want" was the Right Answer

The startups I want to discuss in this article are companies that aim for rapid growth in a short period of time. To avoid misunderstanding, I want to explicitly call startups that aim for rapid growth in a short period of time "high-growth startups".

Paul Graham wrote an article saying "Startup = Growth", and in that article, he listed two conditions for rapid growth:

(a) make something lots of people want, and
(b) reach and serve all those people

I think the 2010s were an era where you only had to think about the motto "Make Something People Want".

First, the startup domain matched this motto well.

Let's consider the first condition. "Make something many people want" is easy to satisfy for something like a barber shop. Almost everyone wants a haircut. But that doesn't make it a high-growth startup. Because the second condition of "Serve all those people" is difficult to satisfy for a barber shop.

On the other hand, software is good at the second condition. Because it has the characteristic of being easy to copy and distribute.

So if you wanted to start a software business and create a high-growth startup, the key was whether you could "Make something many people want", the first condition. If you could accomplish this, you could grow rapidly as a high-growth startup.

For the past 20 years or so, the startup domain has basically been premised on software, so if you were conscious of making something many people want, you could launch a high-growth startup.

The market was expanding rapidly, and it was a period when initial investment and marketing costs were decreasing. At the same time, methodologies such as lean startup and design thinking were being formulated on how to "Make something people want". As a result, as an ecosystem as a whole, if the number of startups increased, high-growth startups would be born at a reasonably high probability.

However, times have changed, and after the boom of the 2010s, I think there are several limitations and issues emerging with this equation.

 

Why "Make Something People Want" Alone is Not Enough

Issue 1: Prone to Becoming a Small Business

In the software market, opportunities in easily accessible areas are gradually decreasing.

In the past, for software startups, the problem you chose might have grown along with the market, but as this happens less frequently, if you choose a small problem at the beginning, you may end up staying with that small problem and over-optimizing for it.

Lean startup and design thinking teach methodologies for "making something people want", but they don't teach whether it will become a big business. Even if you can correctly practice the lean startup methodology, if you fail in choosing the problem, it will become a small business.

In fact, unlike a generation ago, there are fewer companies that achieve great success in the B2C domain, and fewer prominent young entrepreneurs.

On the other hand, veterans who are newly starting software businesses are beginning to launch multiple products almost simultaneously. They need to consciously choose problems, and starting up also requires strategy.

 

Issue 2: The Correct Domains are Limited

As it was said that "Software is eating the world", the 2010s were truly an era in which software devoured every industry. I think software will continue to be important going forward, but it seems to be settling down a bit compared to the huge waves it used to create. On the other hand, innovation in non-software domains is in demand worldwide, and there are big opportunities lying dormant.

But in those domains, "Serve all those people", the second condition, is difficult, and you need to understand various costs and have the right strategy. There are more things to consider besides "Make something people want".

 

Issue 3: Misunderstanding of "Startups"

In response to the recent attention on startups, it seems that the term "startup" is increasingly being used for forms of entrepreneurship that don't aim for rapid growth. Some people seem to have the perception that if technology is involved and you call it "something-tech", it's a startup.

There are various types of startups. For example, in a past article, I introduced four types:

  1. Survival - Business for making a living
  2. Lifestyle - Entrepreneurship for freedom or hobbies. Relatively small-scale, not much considering expansion
  3. Managed Growth - Aiming for steady growth
  4. Aggressive Growth - Aiming for rapid growth

All of these satisfy "Make something people want".

On the other hand, what Japanese society as a whole needs and expects are high-growth startups, the aggressive growth type of entrepreneurship that creates the next industries.

If so, it would be better to have a motto that encourages such rapid-growth startups.

 

Issue 4: The Downside of Solely Pursuing "Make Something People Want"

When you are conscious of "making something people want", you inevitably become myopic. Contracted software development is also "making something people want", but unfortunately it is difficult to become a startup and create products that greatly change the world.

Furthermore, if we become too conscious of what people want, we may end up creating services that monetize through political division.

Originally, the premise of "Make something people want" should have been "Make a better future", but as this perspective has gradually been lost, I think there are downsides to overpromoting "Make something people want" when I feel that such viewpoints are being lost.

 

Issue 5: Reflection on the Future and Ideals

I think many people would agree with Peter Thiel's words: "We wanted flying cars, instead we got 140 characters".

Startups in the past had the premise of having a grand ambition to "change the world", and tried to create businesses on top of that. In a sense, it was ignorant, arrogant, and naive, but this idealistic attitude itself was the driving force behind startups and innovation.

However, that attitude seems to be fading now.

Are we able to declare dreams like "Organize the world's information and make it universally accessible and useful", "Create a new currency", or "Connect the world"? Are we truly aiming to "create industries"? How many exciting initiatives have you heard of that, besides profitability, invite us to a world completely different from the one before?

Looking back, the metric for measuring the success of a startup should have been not only "how much money you made" but also "how much you changed the world".

But now, don't you feel the presence of so-called "suits", the kind of people that Silicon Valley folks used to avoid, is increasing? (Personally, I think it's fine if people wear suits as long as they have grand dreams)

I think effective accelerationism and techno-optimism are emerging from Silicon Valley and elsewhere as a counterpoint and out of a sense of crisis towards this situation.

I myself take a different stance from these positions, but I agree with much of the sense of crisis they have and the trust in technology and humanity that lies behind these philosophies.

That's why I think a motto that serves as a preamble to "Make something people want" is needed.

 

To Change the Current Situation

However, over the past decade, as Japanese startup ecosystem has developed and matured, we have become optimized for "making something people want". We may have become overly optimized for it.

During this time, the frequency of hearing about what problems to tackle, what metrics to look at, the beauty of business models, money, and business growth has increased. And precisely because it has matured and become formulaic, it seems to be becoming increasingly difficult to take risks and create initiatives that will make the future society.

If the meaning inherent in startups is being gutted and the social function expected of startups is being diluted, then I think a countermovement is necessary. That is the background and problem recognition for why a new motto is needed.

 

 

"Make Something the Future World Needs"

Based on this problem recognition, as a new motto, I came up with:

Make Something the Future World Needs

There are three keywords included in this phrase.

 

(1) Solving Problems on a "World" Scale

High-growth startups aim for rapid growth. However, not temporary rapid growth, but medium- to long-term rapid growth. At that time, you need to be concerned about the maximum value of "how much you can grow". If you target a small market, even if you can grow rapidly for a while, you will quickly reach your limit.

The maximum value of a business differs depending on how big of a problem you are trying to solve. If you want to create a business that continues to grow rapidly as a startup, you need to try to solve a global-scale problem. Even if it's domestic, you need to solve a large problem that at least involves all of Japan.

To indicate that sense of scale you are aiming for, I think the word "world" is important.

(By the way, I think some people use the word "world" to refer to their immediate surroundings, but the world here refers to the wider world.)

Furthermore, this phrase implicitly indicates the grand ambition of "changing the world". I think the importance of having a grand vision can also be evoked from this phrase, and the strategy will be one that aims for the world from the very beginning.

"Make something the world needs" is one of the conditions required for many high-growth startups.

 

(2) Targeting the "Future"

I think the word "future" is also important. There are also two reasons for this.

If it's already a big problem and can be solved now, it's a field that established companies are good at. So startups target either:

  • Problems that will become big in the future
  • Problems that can be solved in the future

For the former, you need to grasp the beginning of big changes in the market or culture. For the latter, you need to make an effort to grasp major changes in technology.

In either case, startups aim for rapid growth by taking temporal risks. This increases uncertainty, but that's precisely why established companies hesitate to enter.

As Paul Buchheit said, "Live in the future and build what's missing", if you want to aim for a high-growth startup, you target the future.

 

(3) Make Something "Needed" by the world

While assuming "Make something people want", I am proposing the word "something needed" as a new motto to question the will for the future.

The need to "Make something people want" probably won't change much going forward. Because a business can't be established without it. That aspect is always necessary.

On the other hand, I thought that emphasizing the noble cause of "creating what the world needs" would be more important in fostering future startups.

Additionally, using both "future" and "what we want" could make the concept too vague, so I chose the phrase "what we need" to encourage more compelling and urgent ideas.

By asking ourselves, "Would it be strange if this product didn't exist in the world 10 years from now?" we can determine to a certain extent whether it is "something the future world needs." And even if it is difficult to realize, we should have the determination to create what the future needs, starting from today.

Through this thought process, I hope that we can regain our imagination and determination for the future.

 

 

I think by actively trying to answer this question of "Are we making something the world needs?", the role that startups originally had can be re-emphasized, and it can be well differentiated from other startup styles.

 

The Sprouts of Businesses Needed in the Future

There are many things that the future world desperately needs.

It may be measures against climate change. Climate tech is one domain of that. Creating businesses that serve as countermeasures to climate change is something the world needs, and if successful, you can gain great wealth.

It may be space. Startups like SpaceX have already emerged. If we can acquire resources in space and do various businesses via space, the world will be able to do much more. It may be a distant future, but humanity may need to pioneer space in order to survive.

It may be infrastructure. Many of today's cities took their current form about a century ago. It's time to rebuild aging infrastructure that is nearing the end of its lifespan.

It may be security. Amidst various wars occurring, companies must be wary not only of defense to protect their own country, but also of cybersecurity. Furthermore, from the fact that what is needed to ensure our safety in various fields such as economic security, food security, climate security, and space security is starting to be discussed, strengthening security is in demand.

It may be water and food. Japan's population will decrease, but globally, the population will continue to increase for some time. But if affected by climate change, there may not be enough water (in fact, it's already happening). If there is not enough water, there will not be enough food, and wars could occur. That must be prevented.

It may be healthcare. A world where many people can live long and healthy lives is what everyone is waiting for. Improving access to healthcare, establishing new treatments and new drugs is necessary for the world. Or by supporting the development of artificial wombs and such, it may be possible to provide new careers.

 

There are still many areas that need to be worked on besides the ones listed here, and although few in number, I feel that several startups are emerging. We need to increase such efforts.

And I think increasing challengers in these fields is also good for the Japanese economy.

Because through these businesses that "Make something the future world needs", industrial restructuring can also be done, and it will also create prestigious, high value-added jobs. Furthermore, if thinking opens up toward the future and people can have hope for the future, I think it will generate the dynamism to break through the sense of stagnation in the Japanese economy. In a sense, generating such dynamism is the idealistic aspect that startups possess, and I think that is what is expected of startups.

 

Call to Action

As Paul Graham says, "Most people should not try to start startups". Still, the rare people who try to aim for high-growth startups are a treasure for society as a whole.

I hope that such people will increase, and at the same time, I hope that people who originally had such thoughts will not be swept away by advice from those around them like "At first, just aim for a hit" or "Think calmly and realistically, it's impossible to change the world, so first let's increase your own assets" and flow into other forms of entrepreneurship.

(To avoid misunderstanding, let me emphasize again that I think people who originally aimed for lifestyle entrepreneurship or managed growth entrepreneurship should do so, and that is also a wonderful choice. This is strictly in the sense of avoiding diminishing the grand vision of people who originally had ideals and grand ambitions.)

 

Ideally, we should create successful cases, and have those successful people become role models, but unfortunately, while such real examples have not yet emerged domestically, what we can do now seems to be to put our thoughts into words like this and change the flow even a little.

At the very least, by doing so, I hope it will lead to encouraging people who are thinking about the future world.

And if there are people who want to "Make something the future world needs", there are a few things I want to do.

 

① Let's ask "Are we making something the future world needs?"

I think we can use this question to determine to some extent whether our idea is a high-growth startup or not.

If you hesitate to answer Yes, try to keep thinking about the idea until it becomes a Yes. Or one way is to ask someone who has an answer to that for their ideas.

Also, if the support side advocates high-growth startup support, I feel there is a need to clearly indicate a stance of supporting companies that are trying to "Make something the future world needs".

② People with the same thoughts should gather and advocate

People who don't just want to "do business" but "want to make something the world needs" and "want to have strong ideals", please gather. I think many people who gather are not good at it, but we can't change society if we don't make this voice bigger, and since there are more people in the world who gather in a small and steady way, if we stay in a natural state, many people will be stained by such a culture.

So I would be happy if people who really think they will change the world and create industries agree with the words "Make something the future world needs" or ask those around them. If agreement and questioning spread, the direction of interest around us should change little by little.

And if there are more places for people who are really trying to make something the world needs to gather and share that passion, it should be easier to sustain your own passion.

③ Let's talk about the future

To think about what the future needs, you have to think about the future. I think there are still few such places in Japan, and many people say they don't usually think about the future, so please let me talk about the future together.

 

Summary

There are problems like poverty and inequality that are difficult to solve in the market, so I don't think the form of entrepreneurship called high-growth startups is a panacea, and I think small businesses and other startups also have sufficient value.

But still, I believe there are many problems that can be solved by advancing science and technology and explosively spreading them, and there are also many big problems waiting for early solutions.

To accomplish that, human will is necessary. The clear will to make something the future world needs and "save the world".

 

I don't think there will be many people who agree with this, and I don't think everyone needs to agree. But if there are people who agree with these ideas even a little, I think it would be good if the movement to make something the future world needs can be made visible.

In this way, I hope to generate the next generation of startups together with the rare people who have the will to make what the future world needs.

 

Make something the future world needs.